Compliance Verification Activity Report: CV2223-072 - New Brunswick Power Transmission Corporation

Overview

Compliance verification activity type: Field Inspection

Activity #: CV2223-072
Start date: 2022-09-12
End date: 2022-09-16

Team:

Regulated company: New Brunswick Power Transmission Corporation

Operating company: New Brunswick Power Corporation

Province(s) / Territory(s):

Discipline(s):

Related events:

Rationale and scope:

Follow up inspection of Line 3001 repair/replacement work as identified in CV2021-138. IPL tower structures, conductors, insulators, spacers, dampers, guy wires and grounding were visually inspected. 

Compliance tool(s) used:

Facility details

Facilities:

Regulatory requirements

Regulatory requirements that apply to this activity:

Regulatory instrument number(s):

Observations (no outstanding follow-up required)

Observation 1 - EC-III-18 - Line 3001 - Day 1

Date & time of visit: 2022-09-13 06:00

Discipline: Integrity Management

Categories:

Facility:

Observations:

The New Brunswick Power (NB Power) representatives met with Canada Energy Regulator (CER) CER Inspection Officers (IOs) at the hotel and travelled to the first inspection site. NB Power personnel proceeded with giving CER IOs information on the following topics:

Tower Numbering System

NB Power personnel explained that there is a nomenclature to refer to the different parts of a tower. CER IOs noted the numbering system was convoluted and difficult to explain in writing; the numbering system is shown in Attachments 1 & 2 of the IR Response provided in October 2022.

General Comments

The purpose of the inspection was to:

  1. Follow-up repair completed in response to observations made during a 2018 inspection
  2. Observe the general condition of the IPL and related structures, which may have resulted in new observations from the ones made in 2018. The new members are easy to distinguish because they are shinier and thicker than the original members.
During the inspection, CER IOs accessed 31 towers and observed additional towers from a distance due to access constraints. CER IOs noted the following: Tower 12 (Type A-frame)

CER IOs travelled to Tower 12 where part of the access was through gated private property. The property owner allowed the inspection team to access the site and the gate was opened. Once arrived at the tower’s site, the CER IOs attended the tailboard meeting where all of the safety concerns related to the day’s inspection were discussed. CER IOs signed the attendance list.

CER IOs proceeded to the tower and observed the following:
Tower 15 (Type A-frame)

CER IOs travelled to Tower 15 and observed the following:
Tower 19 (Type A-frame)

CER IOs travelled to Tower 19 and observed the following:
Tower 22 (Type A frame)

CER IOs travelled to Tower 22 and observed the following:
Tower 56 (Type A frame)

CER IOs travelled to Tower 56 and observed the following:
Tower 61 (Type A frame)

CER IOs travelled to Tower 61 and observed the following:
Tower 63 (Type A frame)

CER IOs attempted to access Tower 63 but could not due to poor access conditions. NB Power personnel stated that in the event of an emergency at this tower, mats would be installed such that trucks and equipment can reach the tower if necessary. NB Power indicated that those tower footings were being repaired. NB provided Figure 5: Tower 63 – Footing and Figure 6: Tower 64 – Footing; which show the footing conditions prior to mitigation of towers 63 and 64.

Tower 68 (Type A frame)

CER IOs travelled to Tower 68 and observed the following:
Tower 70 (Type A frame)

CER IOs travelled to Tower 70 and observed the following:
Tower 71 (Type A frame)

CER IOs travelled to Tower 71 and observed the following:
Tower 75 (Type A frame)

CER IOs travelled to Tower 75 and observed the following:
Tower 76 (Type A frame)

CER IOs travelled to Tower 76 and observed the following:
Tower 80 (Type A frame)

CER IOs travelled to Tower 80 and observed the following:
Tower 79 (Type B frame)

CER IOs travelled to Tower 79 and observed the following:
Tower 130

CER IOs travelled to Tower 130 and observed the following:

Compliance tool used: No compliance tool used

Observation 2 - EC-III-18 - Line 3001 - Day 2

Date & time of visit: 2022-09-14 07:00

Discipline: Integrity Management

Categories:

Facility:

Observations:

The NB Power representatives met with CER Inspection Officers (IOs) at the hotel and travelled to the first inspection site. Upon arrival at the first tower of the day, the CER IOs attended the tailboard meeting where all of the safety concerns related to the day’s inspection were discussed. CER IOs signed the attendance list.

Tower 83 (Type A frame)

CER IOs travelled to Tower 83 and observed the following:

Tower 102 (Type A frame)

CER IOs travelled to Tower 102 and observed the following:
Tower 105 (Type A frame)

CER IOs travelled to Tower 105 and observed the following:
Tower 110 (Type A frame)

CER IOs travelled to Tower 110 and observed the following:
Tower 111 (Type A frame)

CER IOs travelled to Tower 111 and observed the following:
Tower 109 (Type A frame)

CER IOs travelled to Tower 109 and observed the following:
Tower 131 (Type B frame)

CER IOs travelled to Tower 131, located at the Saint John River crossing and observed the following:
CER IOs also noted: Tower 133 (Type A frame)

CER IOs travelled to Tower 133 and observed the following:
Tower 134 (Type A frame)

CER IOs travelled to Tower 134 and observed the following:
Tower 137A (Type A frame)

CER IOs travelled to Tower 137A (Note: NB Power representatives explained that this tower was added in between Tower 137 and 138 when the new highway was built in the vicinity to raise the conductors higher up above the ground) and observed the following:
Tower 139 (Type B frame)

CER IOs travelled to Tower 139 and observed the following:
Tower 140 (Type A frame)

CER IOs travelled to Tower 140 and observed the following:

Compliance tool used: No compliance tool used

Observation 3 - EC-III-18 - Line 3001 - Day 3

Date & time of visit: 2022-09-15 06:00

Discipline: Integrity Management

Categories:

Facility:

Observations:

The NB Power representatives met with CER Inspection Officers (IOs) at the hotel and travelled to the first inspection site. Once arrived at the first tower of the day, the CER IOs attended the tailboard meeting where all of the safety concerns related to the day’s inspection were discussed. CER IOs signed the attendance list.

Tower 181 (Type A frame)

It was noted that the following observations were made in 2018:

CER IOs further observed the following: Tower 190 (Type A frame)

CER IOs travelled to Tower 190 and observed the following:
Tower 206 (Type A frame)

CER IOs travelled to Tower 206 and observed the following:
Tower 212 (Type A frame)

CER IOs travelled to Tower 212 and observed the following:
Tower 213 (Type B frame)

CER IOs travelled to Tower 213 and observed the following:
Tower 215 was observed at a distance. Using binoculars, CER IOs noted that the hunting platform was removed.
 

Compliance tool used: No compliance tool used

Observation 4 - EC-III-18 - Line 3001 - Grounding Discussion

Date & time of visit: 2022-11-25 12:00

Discipline: Integrity Management

Categories:

Facility:

Observations:

A virtual meeting was held between CER and NB Power personnel to discuss grounding issues in relation to the inspection of 345 kV IPL Line 3001. During the inspection, CER staff noted the absence of ground wire on numerous towers. Staff forwarded the list of towers to NB Power seeking clarification in an IR sent on 28 September 2022. Staff discussed in the meeting requirements of transmission tower grounding to limit touch and step voltages during an electrical fault and due to a lightning strike. In this context, CER staff informed NB Power of safe limits of touch and step voltages as determined by international institutions IEEE and IEC. It was pointed out by CER staff that to be consistent with those international practices, it is important that transmission towers are grounded properly for safety reasons. That said, staff also pointed out that although it is ideal, it may not be required to ground each tower. Staff referred to the following studies for transmission tower grounding designs:

  1. Link 1
  2. Link 2
In response, NB Power confirmed that the line was using counterpoise for tower grounding and that NB Power was working on retrieving the design data. However, NB Power noted to CER staff that the line was built in 1970 which may make the grounding design record difficult to retrieve. NB Power also discussed some records showing the rationale for grounding certain towers depending on soil resistivity measurements. Those records were shared as attachment 2 of its IR response sent on 23 December 2022.

Based on the virtual discussion and the IR responses and attachments, CER staff has no further concerns regarding the grounding method observed during the inspection.

Compliance tool used: No compliance tool used

Observation 5 - Recommendations for IPL EC-III-18 - Line 3001

Date & time of visit: 2022-12-30 12:30

Discipline: Integrity Management

Categories:

Facility:

Observations:

Following the observations made as a result of the IPL inspection, CER IOs have the following recommendations:

  1. Record-Keeping: Sometimes the information provided in NB Power submission #1395702 and the Work Order did not match what was observed in the field (refer to sections on Tower 22, 70, 75, and 76 for more details). NB Power is recommended to implement better record-keeping practices to accurately document work that was performed.
  2. Tower 130 Bank Erosion: NB Power is recommended to implement the recommendations listed in the GEMTEC report (Attachment 3 of NB Power IR Response dated 23 December 2022). Specifically with slope stability remediation and monitoring.
  3. Tower 131 Missing Markers: NB Power is recommended to replace markers in accordance with Transport Canada requirements. 

Compliance tool used: No compliance tool used

Observations (company follow-up required)

Identified non-compliances to company plans or procedures are non-compliances either to:

- the condition of an authorization document that requires the implementation of that plan or procedure; or

- the relevant section of the regulations that requires implementation of that plan or procedure including those sections that require implementation of plans or procedures as a part of a Program