Compliance verification activity type: Field Inspection
Team:
Regulated company: Minell Pipeline Limited
Operating company: Manitoba Hydro
Province(s) / Territory(s):
Discipline(s):
Related events:
Rationale and scope:
To follow-up on the company's IR responses (from CV2122-331) regarding its safe excavation procedure, including the process for dealing with unknown or abandoned facilities upon discovery and clarify the locate request process post-incident.
Compliance tool(s) used:
Facilities:
Facility Types
Regulatory requirements that apply to this activity:
Observation 1 - General Observations - Minell Pipeline Remediation Work (Lowering)
Date & time of visit: 2022-10-12 08:30
Discipline: Damage Prevention
Categories:
Facility:
Observations:
CER Inspection Officers (CER IOs) accompanied Manitoba Hydro (Minell) representatives to conduct a field inspection of the remediation work (lowering) on the Minell Natural Gas Pipeline (Minell pipeline) performed by the company's contractor. The following was observed by CER IOs at the worksite:
Compliance tool used: No compliance tool used
Observation 2 - NNC #1 - Edge of Right-of-Way Marker Posts
CER IOs observed pipeline identification signage present on both sides of the roadway (85 N) where the pipeline crosses. The metallic signs were yellow and displayed the name of Manitoba Hydro in black print. One pipeline right-of-way (RoW) marker post was also present on the South side of the roadway a few metres away going East. These were made of yellow plastic with a label displaying the name of Centra Gas and a phone number that was different than the metallic Manitoba Hydro pipeline identification signs. CER IOs were informed that signage maintenance was conducted during annual leak surveys where the company would look for damaged or missing signage, but added that RoW marker posts are not in focus for the annual leak surveys. While the RoW marker posts are not a legislated requirement, CER IOs explained that if pipeline companies have installed RoW marker posts, that they are required to ensure they are maintained accordingly. CER IOs further noted that in this case, RoW marker posts and pipeline identification signs with different emergency contact information can also cause confusion and delays in the case of an emergency. As an alternative, CER IOs also explained that should it be determined by the company that RoW marker posts no longer serve their intended purpose, that the company has the flexibility to vary its applicable procedures accordingly. CER IOs therefore determined that the company did not demonstrate that it adequately monitored its pipeline RoW to ensure that RoW marker posts were maintained in accordance with the company's procedures. A notice of non-compliance pursuant to OPR Section 39 was issued.
Compliance tool used: Notice of Non-compliance (NNC)
Regulatory requirement:
Relevant section(s):
Company action required:
The company is required to:
Due date: 2023-01-31
Date closed: 2023-05-04 Note: the date closed is the date that the inspector completed their review of the company corrective actions for adequacy and determined that no further actions are required.
Reason closed: Requirement met
Compliance achieved: Yes
Observation 3 - NNC #2 - Mechanical Equipment Crossing OPR s. 6.5(1)(e)
Date & time of visit: 2022-10-12 10:00
CER IOs observed the trackhoe cross the pipeline a number of times to excavate a trench on both sides. When IOs asked about any weight or load-bearing assessment conducted by the company to determine if the mechanical equipment used at the worksite was safe to cross, the company indicated that a vehicle/loading assessment was done in 2012 on the Minell Pipeline which determined that highway vehicles and farm equipment were safe to cross where the pipeline has 600 mm of cover of more. The company added that the areas of insufficient cover (less than 600 mm as per the 2012 assessment) for the Minell remediation site were therefore staked to prevent equipment crossing by the contractor. However, IOs determined that using the 2012 assessment was not sufficient to demonstrate that the company has evaluated and managed the risks posed by the crossing of the mechanical equipment used a the remediation site over the Minell Pipeline. Inadequate evaluation of risks is in non-compliance with section 6.5(1)(e) of the Onshore Pipeline Regulations (OPRs) - a notice of non-compliance was therefore issued.
Observation 4 - NNC #3 - Inadequate Procedures for Managing Discovery of/Damage to Unknown Facility
Date & time of visit: 2022-10-14 09:00
Upon review of Manitoba Hydro's safe excavation procedures, CER IOs noted that there were no procedure or process that documents what to do when abandoned, unidentified or foreign infrastructure is found during a ground disturbance activity. Manitoba Hydro confirmed that they do not have a written procedure or process for when foreign abandoned or unidentified infrastructure are exposed during a ground disturbance activity. Section 27 of the OPR requires the company to develop, regularly review and update operation and maintenance manuals that provide information and procedures to promote safety, environmental protection and efficiency in the operation of the pipeline. In addition, OPR Section 6.5 (1)(t) requires the company to establish and implement a process for developing contingency plans for abnormal events that may occur during construction, operation, maintenance, abandonment or emergency situations.
The company is required to develop a corrective and preventive action (CAPA) plan that describes how it plans to address the deficiencies noted in this observation upon discovering foreign buried infrastructure during a ground disturbance activity. This CAPA plan must include a schedule for the implementation of these corrective and preventive actions.
Observation 5 - NNC#4 - Contractor Oversight - Field Supervision of Labourers in the Trench
Date & time of visit: 2022-10-12 07:00
The company is required to develop a corrective and preventive action (CAPA) plan that describes how it plans to address the deficiencies noted in this observation to ensure that unsafe work practices by employees and other persons working with or on behalf of the company on the field are corrected immediately. This CAPA plan must include a schedule for the implementation of these corrective and preventive actions.
Observation 6 - NNC#5 - Tailgate Meeting and Emergency Response Plan (ERP)
Date & time of visit: 2022-10-12 08:00
CER IOs attended the tailgate meeting at the site the morning of 12 October 2022 and noted that the meeting and review of site hazards was very brief and failed to identify several hazards. The work location was rural and CER IOs identified that the nearest medical centre was approximately 45 minutes away in Moosomin, (SK). CER IOs also noted that cellular coverage in the area was spotty.
The company is required to develop a corrective and preventive action (CAPA) plan that describes how it plans to address the deficiencies noted in this observation to ensure that an adequate site-specific emergency response plan is made for maintenance activities and available to employees and persons working with or on behalf of the company while on the field. This CAPA plan must include a schedule for the implementation of these corrective and preventive actions.
Date closed: 2023-05-02 Note: the date closed is the date that the inspector completed their review of the company corrective actions for adequacy and determined that no further actions are required.
Identified non-compliances to company plans or procedures are non-compliances either to:
- the condition of an authorization document that requires the implementation of that plan or procedure; or
- the relevant section of the regulations that requires implementation of that plan or procedure including those sections that require implementation of plans or procedures as a part of a Program